First things first — I hope every reader of AC who saw tonight's (11/14/05) 60 Minutes story on AR and Eco extremists (Ed Bradley reporting) will take advantage of this opportunity and email their comments to CBS at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Mr. Bradley's piece included interviews with Rodney Coronado and Jerry Vlasak. Mr. Coronado served 4 years for having torched labs at Michigan State University, and Jerry Vlasak is infamous for having advocated killing human beings to save animals, most recently (until tonight) in testimony at a Senate hearing on Oct. 26.
Mr. Bradley's piece focussed on the overtly violent actions of the ALF and ELF, and included the perspective of the FBI.
Animal Rights activists will certainly claim that the violent ALF and ELF are but a small minority of their number, not representative of the AR movement as a whole, and they shouldn't be placed in the same category as the those using, advocating and justifying violence.
While it is true that most people who claim to be Animal Rights activists are not themselves violent, it is also true that they share the same ideology that the Jerry Vlasak's of the world believe in: that speciesism is as immoral as racism, that the life of an animal and that of a human are of equal value, and that animals deserve to be accommodated within the same identical moral framework as humans.
But more importantly, the flagship Animal Rights organization — PeTA — has very close ties with both arson-teaching Mr. Coronado and the murder-advocating Dr. Vlasak. And while the 60 Minutes story was a compelling look at ALF and ELF and how they think, what they've done, and how things are changing for the worse for their targets, 60 Minutes treated the ALF/ELF operatives and their violence as if they are completely independent of more familiar above-ground Animal Rights organizations (PeTA and the PCRM [Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine]).
That was a major shortcoming of Mr. Bradley's report. By not exploring this connection, Mr. Bradley let these two organizations off the hook, free to continue their deceptive game and to gather in donations. And he ignored what in my opinion is a far more important story.
For me, the real story is not that there are people who like to torch things, explode bombs and advocate murder for their extreme causes, but that these people are closely tied to extremist groups like PeTA who have maintained through their propaganda efforts a respectable face.
Thus, PeTA contributed $45,200 to the Rodney Coronado Support Committee (which was used to pay Mr. Coronado's legal bills) and floated an additional $25,000 loan to Mr. Coronado's father, a loan that as far as anyone knows, has not yet been repaid.
Why would PeTA do this? I don't know — maybe the answer is to be found in the governments sentencing memorandum (pdf), which states on pages 8 - 9 that Mr. Coronado sent packages by prearrangement to PeTA President Ingrid Newkirk and another PeTA employee before and immediately after the MSU fire he served time for setting. Perhaps this $70,000 was "hush money." What a pity Mr. Bradley didn't ask.
PeTA also contributed $1,500 to the Earth Liberation Front. What a pity Mr. Bradley didn't ask about this.
PeTA also has close ties with Dr. Vlasak, who until recently was a spokesman for the PCRM (Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine). The PCRM has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from PeTA through The PeTA Foundation, which has 3 directors, one of them being PCRM President Neal Barnard, and another being PeTA President Ingrid Newkirk.
That's just the tip of the iceberg that 60 Minutes managed to miss.
Here is the transcript of the 60 Minutes AR-Eco extremist segment:
When they first emerged in the mid-1990s, the environmental extremists calling themselves the “Earth Liberation Front” announced they were “the burning rage of a dying planet.”
Ever since, the ELF, along with its sister group, the Animal Liberation Front, has been burning everything from SUV dealerships to research labs to housing developments.
In recent years, these so-called “eco-terrorists” have been responsible for more than a thousand crimes resulting in over $100 million in damage. And their tactics and rhetoric continue to escalate.
Things have gotten so bad, the FBI now considers them the country’s biggest domestic terrorist threat.
Correspondent Ed Bradley reports.
The biggest act of eco-terrorism in U.S. history was a fire, deliberately set on the night of August 1, 2003, that destroyed a nearly-completed $23 million apartment complex just outside San Diego. The fire was set to protest urban sprawl.
“It was the biggest fire I have ever responded to as a firefighter,” remembers Jeff Carle, a division chief for the San Diego Fire Department. “That fire was not stoppable. At the stage that the fire was in when we arrived, there were problems in the adjacent occupied apartment complexes. Pine trees were starting to catch fire. Items on patios were starting to light up and catch fire. And we had to direct our activity towards saving life before we could do anything about the property.”
Hundreds were roused from their beds and evacuated. Luckily, nobody – including firefighters – was injured. By the time the fire burned itself out the next morning, all that remained was a 12-foot-long banner that read: “If you build it, we will burn it.” Also on the banner was the acronym: E-L-F.
When Carle saw the banner, he says he knew he had a problem.
A problem, because he knew what ELF stood for: the Earth Liberation Front, the most radical fringe of the environmental movement. It’s the same group that set nine simultaneous fires across the Vail Mountain ski resort in 1998 to protest its expansion, causing $12 million in damage.
And it is the same group that has left SUV dealerships across America looking like scenes from Iraq’s Sunni triangle, their way of protesting the gas-guzzling habits of American car buyers.
"Their way of protesting" are acts of terror, and are intrinsically very very dangerous . . . one can never be sure when some useful idiot (or "lone wolf" as the FBI puts it below) will decide to take Dr. Vlasak's message to heart and try his hand at assassination, and by its nature, a conflagration is immensely dangerous, not only to those who have to fight it, but to others who might be injured as first responders speed along the street to get to the fire, and to people who live near by the fire.
The ELF is a spin-off of another group called the ALF, or Animal Liberation Front, whose masked members have been known to videotape themselves breaking into research labs, where they destroy years of painstaking work and free captive animals. In recent years, they’ve capped off their visits by burning down the buildings. Still, they insist they are non-violent.
“For every arson that I've carried out, there's probably three or four that were not carried out for that fear of injuring somebody,” says Rod Coronado, a former ALF leader, who is widely-credited with introducing arson to the cause.
I guess we should all thank Mr. Coronado for his restraint . . . Mr. Coronado acts as if once started, his fires will act predictably and behave according to his wishes.
Right . . .
He spent four years in prison for setting six fires, including one at Michigan State University.
Why burn down a building?
“It's simply because after years of rescuing animals from laboratories, it was heartbreaking to see those buildings and those cages refilled within the following days. And for that reason, arson has become a necessary tool,” says Coronado.
" . . . a necessary tool . . ." to be employed selectively against SUV dealers, ski resorts, scientists and research institutions but not against PeTA, an organization that kills almost 80% of the animals it takes into its shelter . . .
Oh wait — I forgot! PeTA paid Mr. Coronado's legal fees and floated that loan to his father!
Coronado says the ALF and ELF operate in small autonomous “cells.” He says he usually worked with five or less people.
Asked how after choosing a target, a mission is carried out, Coronado says, “Those are the types of things that take nights and nights and weeks and weeks of reconnaissance to make sure that you know in the one hour that you're going to take action, that there will be absolutely no risk to any living being. The fact that nobody was ever injured in any of the actions that I’ve been accused of is not a coincidence.”
The fact that nobody's been hurt is dumb luck. It's going to happen . . .
There are dots here . . .
Coronado says these days, he’s simply an unofficial spokesperson for the ALF and ELF. And in that role, he travels across the country giving lectures on the groups’ philosophies and tactics.
Many in law enforcement believe Coronado is still active in the movement as an organizer and recruiter. He recently found a GPS tracking device under his Jeep, which he believes was planted by the FBI. And, he just happened to have a speaking engagement in San Diego the day after the fire.
Coronado says he knew nothing about the condo complex fire, yet he has traveled around the country and encourage people to do this sort of thing. [About here, Mr. Bradley asks him if he's trying to recruit "impressionable people" — a wonderful term . . . ed]
“Encouragement through explanation and demonstration of my own actions,” says Coronado. “I've showed them how I set fires. I showed them how the ELF and the ALF, what their mode of operation is.”
“I'm asking for people courageous enough to take those risks for what they believe in,” said Coronado.
60 Minutes was surprised when one of those people, a man claiming to be an active ALF cell leader, came out of the shadows to grant what he called “the group’s first on camera interview in 20 years,” as long as we didn’t see his face or record his voice.
He told us that his cell has conducted operations from coast to coast, and every one of them was what he considered to be non-violent because nobody was injured. He said under the mask he is a normal, otherwise law-abiding citizen, and that his friends and family have no idea about his activities. He said he thinks it’s “abysmal” that the FBI considers them America’s top domestic terrorist threat, because unlike neo-Nazi groups, the ALF has never hurt anyone.
First, there's a companion piece to the 60 Minutes segment which consists of a transcript of the interview with the ALF leader. I may comment on it in a later post.
Second, there seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of terror.
Terror is a state of mind, and murder is one of many ways of creating that state of mind.
In other words, murder can be a means to a terrorists end, but the end itself is a terrorized mind. If you can cause a terrorized mind by threats rather than murder, the threats are just as much a terrorist tool as is murder. If you murder "A" and it causes some "B" to be terrified, then the murder is an act of terror. But if there is no "B" who is terrified by "A's" murder, the murder isn't an act of terror, however appalling, disgusting and gruesome it might be.
So claiming that "our techniques aren't terrorist because nobody has died" is downright stupid.
Even SHAC appreciates this, which is why when they once listed on their website their "Top 20 Terror Tactics", none of these was murder.
“Having the FBI chase you around is not a good thing,” says John Lewis, a Deputy Assistant Director for Counterterrorism at the FBI. Lewis is the man charged with stamping out eco-terrorism in the United States.
Lewis says the bureau is aware of over 1,000 attacks and says these groups are considered such a threat is because they have caused over $100 million worth of damage nationwide. He says there are more than 150 investigations of eco-terrorist crimes underway.
Lewis says the arsonists who started the fires in San Diego and Vail remain on the loose. But he says investigations have led to “approximately 40 arrests or prosecutions” for other eco-terror crimes.
Lewis says these groups use the Internet to pass along information and to take credit for their crimes. He admits they’re not in the same league as al Qaeda but he says they’re ratcheting up their actions and turning up the rhetoric.
The information passed along consists of personal information about the target and his or her family and friends, demonization of the target, and, in the case of SHAC, a listing of the "Top 20 Terror Tactics", which once appeared on the SHAC web page (interestingly, none of those was murder.)
Taking credit for an attack makes future threats credible, and all the more terrifying to future targets.
Which, after all, is the point . . .
“There have been multiple statements made regarding assassination and/or killing of individuals involved in, for instance, biomedical research and that kind of thing,” says Lewis.
Case in point is Dr. Jerry Vlasak, a practicing trauma surgeon in Los Angeles, who also acts as a spokesperson for several extreme animal rights groups. Vlasak has told audiences that it’s time to consider assassinating people who do research on animals.
Vlasak has been quoted as saying ‘I think for five lives, ten lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, two million, ten million nonhuman lives.’
“I think people who torture innocent beings should be stopped. And if they won't stop when you ask them nicely, they won't stop when you demonstrate to them what they're doing is wrong, then they should be stopped using whatever means necessary,” Vlasak replied.
Of course, you have to understand that when Dr. Vlasak uses the word "torture" its meaning isn't confined to the sorts of activities that come to most people's minds. Dr. Vlasak's definition is an expanded one, and includes virtually every instance in which an animal is treated in a way one would not treat a human.
Vlasak says he is not going to do that, pointing out he is a physician. “My role in the movement is not to go out and do that, but to explain to the mainstream media and to the public in general why these people are doing what they're doing.”
Asked if Vlasak wants someone to go out there and kill, Vlasak says, “I want people who care about animals to do what's necessary to stop their exploitation, to stop their suffering.”
Vlasak says someone who believes that the life of an animal is not akin to the life of a human being is “species-ist.”
Species-ists, he says, are akin to racists or sexists. Animals, he says, should be accorded the same rights as human beings, despite their place on the food chain.
“Just like at one time black humans were considered property. Well, dogs, cats and all other animals in our society are still considered property,” Vlasak says.
I couldn't have said it better myself . . .
Of course, Dr. Vlasak isn't alone in his belief that speciesism is intrinsically as immoral as racism: that principle is the pillar upon which the entire AR ideology rests. When you honestly believe that the life of an animal is as valuable as that of a human, then what is the argument against killing "n" humans if you can save "n + 1" animals? And Dr. Vlasak is nothing if not an honest believer . . .
Asked who he thinks is fair game, Vlasak says, “Well, I think anybody that tortures animals for a living or for a profit and who won't stop when they're asked to and won't stop.”
Does that include researchers who are testing and performing tests using animals?”
“Animal researchers, slaughterhouse workers, the head of the corporation that slaughters hundreds of millions of chickens every single year for the taste of their flesh,” says Vlasak.
. . . the technicians at PeTA who kill so many of the animals they take in to their shelter, Ingrid Newkirk, PeTA President, who admits that PeTA could run a "no-kill" shelter . . . the possibilities are endless . . .
Well, people like chicken.
“People liked owning slaves too, okay. That doesn't make it right,” Vlasak said.
What an astonishingly dumb question . . . surely they could have edited that one out . . .
Vlasak says it’s very straightforward in his mind.
“We don't live in a country where it's okay to kill people if we don't necessarily like what they're doing. If we have someone who actively embraces this then what’s next?” says John Lewis.
What’s next, he says, is the emergence of a “lone wolf” like Eric Rudolph or Ted Kaczynski, something that has already happened.
A mysterious bomber was caught on surveillance camera in 2003 planting two sophisticated explosive devices late at night outside a company that makes vaccines in northern California, a company targeted by animal rights activists. One bomb was set to go off an hour after the first - after firemen and police arrived – but it was spotted by a night watchman. A few weeks later a third bomb went off outside another company, this one strapped with nails.
“Anyone from 50 feet of that particular bomb probably would have been killed or seriously injured,” says the FBI’s David Strange, who is in charge of the investigation.
Strange thinks the second explosive was designed to hurt or kill the first responders that show up to the scene. He says it was the first time he heard of eco-terrorists using bombs.
Strange says the FBI has identified the suspected bomber as Daniel Andreas San Diego, a 27-year-old animal rights activist from San Rafael, California, who is now a fugitive after he slipped an FBI surveillance team.
But he left behind a message, posted on a Web site sympathetic to the Animal Liberation Front. Part of it reads, “We will now be doubling the size of every device we make.”
“I'll ask you. Why does someone build an improvised explosive device with shrapnel, nails and such, if they're not intending to cause someone grievous harm if not worse?” says Lewis.
The rules are changing . . . which makes ALF/ELF threats all the more credible, all the more likely of causing terror.
There is a definite split in the movement when it comes to violence.
After torching a forest research station in Irvine, Pennsylvania, one ELF cell threatened to “pick up the gun.”
“I think it's sort off disingenuous to say ‘Well, we can burn down buildings. But we can't use explosives. Or we can use explosives. But we can't do anything that might harm a person.’ I think what we have to do is look at the big picture. We have to look at what works,” says Dr. Jerry Vlasak.
Isn't that chilling? Dr. Vlasak is willing to advocate whatever it takes to achieve the AR agenda, including murder, on his steadfast belief that his conscience is infallible!
Dr. Vlasak is his own god . . .
The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are also looking at what works. They’re winning longer prison sentences for convicted eco-terrorists. And they’re pushing legislation in congress that would make it a crime to threaten violence against any person or institution that uses animals to do business.
Well — I encourage you to write to CBS at email@example.com and express your views. Be polite, make your note short and sweet, and make only one or two quick points.